Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow for PowerFeeds to be searched from their related objects name #11422

Closed
jsenecal opened this issue Jan 6, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #12443
Closed

Allow for PowerFeeds to be searched from their related objects name #11422

jsenecal opened this issue Jan 6, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #12443
Assignees
Labels
status: accepted This issue has been accepted for implementation type: feature Introduction of new functionality to the application

Comments

@jsenecal
Copy link
Contributor

jsenecal commented Jan 6, 2023

NetBox version

v3.4.1

Feature type

Change to existing functionality

Proposed functionality

When searching for a PowerFeed, its is not currently possible to use the PowerPanel name as a "quick" filter in the search field.

The proposal is to add these to the filterset at dcim/filtersets.py#L1841

Use case

Colocation providers will sometimes name their circuits in a way that would not identify their panel,

POWER0175624P > MTL71.4.415.0.RPP.B6.UPS500-B

Searching for "UPS500" yields no results in that case.

Database changes

None

External dependencies

None

@jsenecal jsenecal added the type: feature Introduction of new functionality to the application label Jan 6, 2023
@jsenecal jsenecal self-assigned this Jan 6, 2023
@jeremystretch
Copy link
Member

@jsenecal do you still intend to work on this?

@jeremystretch jeremystretch added the status: needs owner This issue is tentatively accepted pending a volunteer committed to its implementation label May 2, 2023
@jeremystretch jeremystretch added status: accepted This issue has been accepted for implementation and removed status: needs owner This issue is tentatively accepted pending a volunteer committed to its implementation labels May 3, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 2, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
status: accepted This issue has been accepted for implementation type: feature Introduction of new functionality to the application
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants