Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Contact to Prefix or Aggregate #13764

Closed
francesco-noc opened this issue Sep 14, 2023 · 3 comments · Fixed by #16211
Closed

Add Contact to Prefix or Aggregate #13764

francesco-noc opened this issue Sep 14, 2023 · 3 comments · Fixed by #16211
Assignees
Labels
status: accepted This issue has been accepted for implementation type: feature Introduction of new functionality to the application

Comments

@francesco-noc
Copy link

francesco-noc commented Sep 14, 2023

NetBox version

v3.7.3

Feature type

New functionality

Proposed functionality

The proposed functionality is to allow a Contact to be added to a Prefix or Aggregate. The changes required are very low-impact and mainly concern views, I already made them in our Netbox instance.

Use case

In large organization (e.g. we own two class B networks) probably some aggregates or some prefix are managed by different people/groups. So, for instance, in the event of security incident or simply the deploy of new workstation/server it's necessary to contact that subnet's referent and it should be useful find it in Netbox.

Database changes

No response

External dependencies

No response

@francesco-noc francesco-noc added the type: feature Introduction of new functionality to the application label Sep 14, 2023
@whtkam
Copy link

whtkam commented Dec 10, 2023

We also have such a need, we would even need it for IP addresses.

@francesco-noc
Copy link
Author

Given our other needs and also requests here and in other discussions. I have implemented the ability to add contacts to Aggregates, Prefixes, IP ranges and IP addresses.

Here you can see the changes.

@francesco-noc
Copy link
Author

This issue was opened with version 3.6.1 but my proposed implementation is for 3.7.3

@jeremystretch jeremystretch added the status: needs owner This issue is tentatively accepted pending a volunteer committed to its implementation label May 14, 2024
@arthanson arthanson self-assigned this May 20, 2024
@arthanson arthanson removed the status: needs owner This issue is tentatively accepted pending a volunteer committed to its implementation label May 20, 2024
@jeremystretch jeremystretch added the status: accepted This issue has been accepted for implementation label May 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
status: accepted This issue has been accepted for implementation type: feature Introduction of new functionality to the application
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants