Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Custom field - object link get lost in object view by updating NetBox to 3.3-beta1 #9843

Closed
cybarox opened this issue Jul 26, 2022 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
beta Concerns a bug/feature in a beta release status: accepted This issue has been accepted for implementation type: bug A confirmed report of unexpected behavior in the application

Comments

@cybarox
Copy link
Contributor

cybarox commented Jul 26, 2022

NetBox version

v3.3-beta1

Python version

3.9

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Fire up NetBox in version 3.2.7
  2. Create new custom field
  • name: IP
  • type: object - IPAM | IPAddress
  • assigned model: Circuits | Circuit
  1. Create new IP-address object (e.g 1.1.1.1/32)
  2. Create provider
  3. Create circuit type
  4. Create new circuit with IP-Address set in custom field
  • IP-address is linked in custom field section (object view) and in table view
  1. checkout feature branch (3.3-beta1)
  2. run upgrade.sh and restart services

RESULT: IP-Addess in Custom Field is linked in table view but not in object view of the circuit anymore.

Expected Behavior

Custom field in circuit object is linked to selected IP address object.

<td>
    <a href="/ipam/ip-addresses/1/">1.1.1.1/32</a>
</td>

Observed Behavior

Link to ip address object is missing only shows text without link in object view

<td>
    1.1.1.1/32
</td>
@cybarox cybarox added the type: bug A confirmed report of unexpected behavior in the application label Jul 26, 2022
@jeremystretch jeremystretch added the beta Concerns a bug/feature in a beta release label Jul 26, 2022
@jeremystretch jeremystretch self-assigned this Jul 26, 2022
@jeremystretch jeremystretch added the status: accepted This issue has been accepted for implementation label Jul 26, 2022
@jeremystretch
Copy link
Member

Looks like a regression introduced by #9647. Thanks for the report!

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 25, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
beta Concerns a bug/feature in a beta release status: accepted This issue has been accepted for implementation type: bug A confirmed report of unexpected behavior in the application
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants