fix: remove naming conflict #572
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
There was a const being declared with the same name as a function in the outer scope. I _think_ this could be responsible for netlify#569
|
@jlengstorf Thanks for the PR. I've found the issue for your project, it's a different one but this was also a bug. Thanks 🎉 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a const being declared with the same name as a function in the outer scope. I think this could be responsible for #569, but in any case it’s probably worth renaming to avoid confusion/naming collisions.
- Summary
- Test plan
- Description for the changelog
- A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)