Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(deps): update typescript-eslint monorepo to v5.40.1 #588

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 24, 2022

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Oct 10, 2022

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin 5.38.1 -> 5.40.1 age adoption passing confidence
@typescript-eslint/parser 5.38.1 -> 5.40.1 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@​typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin)

v5.40.1

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • eslint-plugin: Skip missing 'rest' tuple type arguments in no-misused-promises (#​5809) (c5beaa2), closes #​5807

v5.40.0

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • eslint-plugin: [consistent-indexed-object-style] handle interface generic (#​5746) (7a8a0a3)
  • eslint-plugin: [no-unnecessary-condition] handle void (#​5766) (ac8f06b)
Features

v5.39.0

Compare Source

Features
  • eslint-plugin: allow using void as a default type for a generic argument if allowInGenericTypeArguments is specified (#​5671) (bb46ef0)

5.38.1 (2022-09-26)

Note: Version bump only for package @​typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@​typescript-eslint/parser)

v5.40.1

Compare Source

Note: Version bump only for package @​typescript-eslint/parser

v5.40.0

Compare Source

Note: Version bump only for package @​typescript-eslint/parser

v5.39.0

Compare Source

Note: Version bump only for package @​typescript-eslint/parser

5.38.1 (2022-09-26)

Note: Version bump only for package @​typescript-eslint/parser


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 3am on Monday" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, click this checkbox.

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the type: bug code to address defects in shipped code label Oct 10, 2022
kodiakhq[bot]
kodiakhq bot previously approved these changes Oct 10, 2022
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo branch from fc14ea9 to 4242f63 Compare October 10, 2022 20:38
@renovate renovate bot changed the title fix(deps): update typescript-eslint monorepo to v5.39.0 fix(deps): update typescript-eslint monorepo to v5.40.0 Oct 10, 2022
kodiakhq[bot]
kodiakhq bot previously approved these changes Oct 10, 2022
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo branch from 4242f63 to 46a4859 Compare October 17, 2022 18:44
@renovate renovate bot changed the title fix(deps): update typescript-eslint monorepo to v5.40.0 fix(deps): update typescript-eslint monorepo to v5.40.1 Oct 17, 2022
@ryanbonial ryanbonial added type: bug code to address defects in shipped code and removed type: bug code to address defects in shipped code labels Oct 21, 2022
@renovate
Copy link
Contributor Author

renovate bot commented Oct 24, 2022

Autoclosing Skipped

This PR has been flagged for autoclosing. However, it is being skipped due to the branch being already modified. Please close/delete it manually or report a bug if you think this is in error.

@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot merged commit 9420b15 into main Oct 24, 2022
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot deleted the renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo branch October 24, 2022 15:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type: bug code to address defects in shipped code
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant