DEP: Deprecate random_triad #7061
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rossbar
force-pushed
the
plane-dep-random-triad
branch
from
041ec42
to
287e02f
Compare
dschult
approved these changes
Nov 8, 2023
cvanelteren
pushed a commit
to cvanelteren/networkx
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 22, 2024
DEP: Deprecate random_triad.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Another proposal for deprecation in the
triadsmodule. This is another one-liner "helper function". It doesn't appear to have any special meaning w.r.t triadic analysis and isn't used at all internally. The one caveat here though is that unlike "triplets" (see #7060), triads are only defined for directed graphs. In other words, if a user didnx.subgraph(G, random.sample(list(G), 3))andGwasn't a directed graph, then this would technically not be a triad (at least given the current definitions - see #4386 for related discussion).