Transmogrify _dispatchable objects into functions
#7298
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Oh my, those are fascinating test failures. Maybe I'll have a reason to understand argmap after all. |
jarrodmillman
approved these changes
Feb 22, 2024
cvanelteren
pushed a commit
to cvanelteren/networkx
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 22, 2024
* Transmogrify `_dispatchable` objects into functions * fix?
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
_dispatchableobjects don't look good in REPRs and they make it really awkward for type checkers. This PR usesargmapto transmogrify_dispatchableobjects into functions. I hope to someday understandargmap.@rossbar, this is as discussed in #7185 and the meeting today. Everything looks good in REPRs to me. This PR supercedes #7185.
CC @rlratzel