-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[joss][question] Size of $\epsilon$ term? #22
Comments
Thank you for pointing this out. It is indeed in voxel space, and with current MRI data, we would not expect this to become a problem. It does change the exact space at which a control point faints out, but in practice, the amount of voxels in an MRI even if it were smaller or bigger, is usually about 300. We also tested with high resolution data of small brains (for example a mouse: dim: 420 x 548 x 282, pixdim: 0.03 x 0.03 x 0.03) and also with a big dolphin brain (dim: 461 x 424 x 304, pixdim: 0.30 x 0.30 x 0.30) and the behaviour of the tool doesn't perceivably change. But we could change it in future if we realise that it becomes a problem, so that a user could select a value. |
Question answered :) feel free to close or document, up 2 u |
documented! In commit a061d22 Thank you again :) |
Part of: openjournals/joss-reviews#6336
The text reads
I see the$\epsilon$ term is set as
0.001
here:thresholdmann/thresholdmann-worker.js
Line 29 in 25090ab
Is that always a trivially small value, or is there some scale (that's reasonably likely in real data) where that might be a problem? I guess i am not quite clear on the units of the space to know. it seems like it's in voxel index space?
just posing as a question, y'all are the experts on brains of all sizes, and whether there might be some tiny hydra neuron edge case to worry about :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: