Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Folding -- supposed to be in a form of algorithm, without ids storage #489

Closed
6 tasks done
Tracked by #466
nicolay-r opened this issue Jun 21, 2023 · 0 comments
Closed
6 tasks done
Tracked by #466
Assignees
Labels
critical enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@nicolay-r
Copy link
Owner

nicolay-r commented Jun 21, 2023

Reason: we need to provide ids aside. Folding and doc-ids are not the same entities in nature.

  • fold_doc_ids_set should have doc_ids as a parameter
  • ❌ Remove unided folding
  • ❌ Remove iter_doc_ids method (used in unided folding)
  • ❌ Remove contains_doc_id method
  • ❌ Remove iter_supported_data_types
  • ❌ Removed from SamplesIO (fdff30e)

doc_ids_iter=data_folding.fold_doc_ids_set()[data_type],

@nicolay-r nicolay-r self-assigned this Jun 21, 2023
@nicolay-r nicolay-r added enhancement New feature or request critical labels Jun 21, 2023
@nicolay-r nicolay-r changed the title Folding -- supposed to be in a form of algorithm, without ids storage Folding -- supposed to be in a form of algorithm, without ids storage Jun 21, 2023
nicolay-r added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 3, 2023
nicolay-r added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 3, 2023
nicolay-r added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 19, 2023
nicolay-r added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 21, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
critical enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant