-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 576
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[FIX] fix SimpleRegressionResults #4071
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
da22b3f
fix simple regression results
Remi-Gau e393693
update changelog
Remi-Gau 9e084e9
add test
Remi-Gau 6a181f3
Update doc/changes/latest.rst
Remi-Gau 0163b63
Merge branch 'main' into simple_reg
Remi-Gau 3a48f9a
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into simple_reg
Remi-Gau 87b7154
revert change of using property
Remi-Gau a9fadff
lint
Remi-Gau File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have no issue with the change, but could you explain what it means/implies ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As far as I can tell these decorators do the same thing but one comes from the standard library, so feels like it is more appropriate to use it.
Do you want me to mention it in the changelog?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
IIUC it's not exactly the same, as property doesn't store the value as an object attribute after initial call (see https://nipy.org/nibabel/reference/nibabel.onetime.html#auto-attr). While using property works as well it seems it could add function call overhead that could affect performance. You could time some tests that we already have to quickly compare one versus the other.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You were right @ymzayek it would make the code quite a bit slower.
Ran the following script on this branch and on main.
On main I am at about 0.197 seconds per iteration.
On this branch it increases up to 0.943 seconds per iteration if I try to get the residuals 10 times.
So yeah will revert those decorators.