[REF] Clarify code in find_parcellation_cut_coords function

[ymzayek]

• Closes Refactor unclear code section #3815

[github-actions]

👋 @ymzayek Thanks for creating a PR!

Until this PR is ready for review, you can include the [WIP] tag in its title, or leave it as a github draft.

Please make sure it is compliant with our contributing guidelines. In particular, be sure it checks the boxes listed below.

• PR has an interpretable title.
• PR links to Github issue with mention Closes #XXXX (see our documentation on PR structure)
• Code is PEP8-compliant (see our documentation on coding style)
• Changelog or what's new entry in doc/changes/latest.rst (see our documentation on PR structure)

For new features:

• There is at least one unit test per new function / class (see our documentation on testing)
• The new feature is demoed in at least one relevant example.

For bug fixes:

• There is at least one test that would fail under the original bug conditions.

We will review it as quick as possible, feel free to ping us with questions if needed.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (aa9c914) 91.63% compared to head (6e7a020) 91.67%.
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #4107      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   91.63%   91.67%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         143      143              
  Lines       16115    16115              
  Branches     3353     3353              
==========================================
+ Hits        14767    14773       +6     
+ Misses        800      794       -6     
  Partials      548      548              

Flag	Coverage Δ
macos-latest_3.10	91.58% <100.00%> (+0.03%)	⬆️
macos-latest_3.11	91.58% <100.00%> (+0.03%)	⬆️
macos-latest_3.12	91.58% <100.00%> (+0.03%)	⬆️
macos-latest_3.9	91.55% <100.00%> (+0.03%)	⬆️
ubuntu-latest_3.10	91.58% <100.00%> (+0.03%)	⬆️
ubuntu-latest_3.11	91.58% <100.00%> (+0.03%)	⬆️
ubuntu-latest_3.12	91.58% <100.00%> (+0.03%)	⬆️
ubuntu-latest_3.9	91.55% <100.00%> (+0.03%)	⬆️
windows-latest_3.10	91.54% <100.00%> (+0.03%)	⬆️
windows-latest_3.11	91.54% <100.00%> (+0.03%)	⬆️
windows-latest_3.12	91.54% <100.00%> (+0.03%)	⬆️
windows-latest_3.9	91.50% <100.00%> (+0.03%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[bthirion]

LGTM so far.

[Remi-Gau]

Apparently my first review disappeared in an internet connection glitch...

So good with me and long live variables with explicit names (this is not a comment on the scope of variables)...

thanks @ymzayek