Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

STY: Flake8 3.6+ cleanup #695

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 29, 2018
Merged

STY: Flake8 3.6+ cleanup #695

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 29, 2018

Conversation

effigies
Copy link
Member

Fixes #687.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 91.851% when pulling 0c4256d on effigies:fix/flake8 into 118d305 on nipy:master.

@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #695 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 90%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #695   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   88.88%   88.88%           
=======================================
  Files          93       93           
  Lines       11449    11449           
  Branches     1892     1892           
=======================================
  Hits        10176    10176           
  Misses        933      933           
  Partials      340      340
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
nibabel/nicom/dwiparams.py 71.69% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
nibabel/spatialimages.py 96.33% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
nibabel/xmlutils.py 85.36% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
nibabel/py3k.py 35.71% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
nibabel/quaternions.py 99.02% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
nibabel/affines.py 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
nibabel/nifti1.py 91.22% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
nibabel/casting.py 84.74% <50%> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 118d305...0c4256d. Read the comment docs.

@effigies
Copy link
Member Author

Minor cleanups, so I'll merge tomorrow unless someone wants to review sooner.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants