Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for mix-in annotations #8

Closed
jmgilmour opened this issue Dec 20, 2013 · 3 comments
Closed

Add support for mix-in annotations #8

jmgilmour opened this issue Dec 20, 2013 · 3 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@jmgilmour
Copy link

I am very interested in using your product. In my project, Jackson is currently being used on the server-side to do serialization/deserialization into json. We'd love to be able to integrate gwt-jackson into our GWT GUI as well.

However, we use mix-in annotations (mostly to @JsonIgnore methods) so that we can keep our POJOs free of serialization-related annotations.

It would be great if gwt-jackson supported mix-in annotations.

Info about mix-in annotaitons can be found here: http://wiki.fasterxml.com/JacksonMixInAnnotations

@ghost ghost assigned nmorel Dec 20, 2013
@nmorel
Copy link
Owner

nmorel commented Dec 20, 2013

I agree, it would be great :)

One way to do it would be to use the configuration class added in issue #6 to give the mixin class and the target class to the compiler via a new method.

@nmorel nmorel modified the milestones: 0.6.0, 0.5.0 Mar 26, 2014
@nmorel
Copy link
Owner

nmorel commented Jun 11, 2014

I started to work on it in branch mixin. It was almost done for annotations on type. I'll try to resume the work on it as soon as I find some time.

nmorel added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 28, 2014
@nmorel
Copy link
Owner

nmorel commented Jun 28, 2014

Done, you can look at documentation here.

@nmorel nmorel closed this as completed Jun 28, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants