2016-12-02 - Node Interactive - Notes #76
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
Sorry, something went wrong.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Matches my recollection of events! :) |
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
Sorry, something went wrong.
PR-URL: nodejs#76 Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Jan Olaf Krems <jan.krems@groupon.com>
joshgav
force-pushed
the
node-interactive
branch
from
45ff6b2
to
8dd9bd1
Compare
|
Landed in 8dd9bd1. Now to start tackling some of the items identified :) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Captures major discussion points and next steps from Diagnostics group meeting after Node Interactive.
@nodejs/diagnostics it was great working together at the summit on Friday. quite an intense discussion which hopefully deepened our shared understandings and goals. we also reached some decisions and concrete next steps in several areas 🎉 . PTAL if the discussion points and next steps captured in these notes are correct.
We could really 🙏 use your help in implementing and/or opening issues accordingly 😄
Also could you please add to this thread those who were in the meeting but not on the Diagnostics alias? Thanks!