Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 2, 2023. It is now read-only.

Create Terminology.md #158

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Oct 24, 2018
Merged

Create Terminology.md #158

merged 6 commits into from
Oct 24, 2018

Conversation

SMotaal
Copy link

@SMotaal SMotaal commented Jul 25, 2018

Based on last week's meeting, and based on some testing, this PR would add doc/Terminology.md to the main repo. Please note that we will have to use inline HTML tags for since GFM does not provide respective syntaxes for <dl>, <dt> and <dd>. Both AsciiDoc and RST formats were considered since unlike GFM they actually have syntaxes for definitions, but they bring their own complexities and limitations that made them much less ideal for this document.

Edit (Fishrock123): Rendered Markdown

GeoffreyBooth

This comment was marked as off-topic.

guybedford

This comment was marked as off-topic.

@Fishrock123
Copy link
Contributor

I have added this to the OP:

Edit (Fishrock123): Rendered Markdown

robpalme

This comment was marked as off-topic.

Unlike the more linear "normative" counterparts, stipulative terms are more intricate and often require layered definitions. I took a stab at "Browser Interop" not "browser interoperability" because the latter is non-stipulative in general, while the former to us focuses on "browser interoperability" of ES modules intended for Node.js and …
SMotaal

This comment was marked as off-topic.

SMotaal

This comment was marked as off-topic.

@jkrems
Copy link
Contributor

jkrems commented Oct 9, 2018

Should we land this to allow future additions as PRs? It might also help with visibility. Or are we looking to push to this shared branch?

@SMotaal
Copy link
Author

SMotaal commented Oct 9, 2018

I would love that, so why don't we get approvals so we can merge by next meeting

Copy link
Contributor

@jkrems jkrems left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's merge and iterate!

@SMotaal
Copy link
Author

SMotaal commented Oct 9, 2018

@MylesBorins do we merge this?

@MylesBorins
Copy link
Contributor

@SMotaal we cannot merge until it has been reviewed and approved in a meeting with quorum. That is the current governance rules

@SMotaal
Copy link
Author

SMotaal commented Oct 9, 2018

That's was my thought, so consider this my virtually readding this to modules-agenda for next meeting 😄

@SMotaal SMotaal added the modules-review To be reviewed by team in github thread label Oct 9, 2018
@SMotaal SMotaal added modules-agenda To be discussed in a meeting and removed modules-agenda To be discussed in a meeting labels Oct 9, 2018
@SMotaal SMotaal merged commit f105613 into master Oct 24, 2018
@GeoffreyBooth GeoffreyBooth removed modules-agenda To be discussed in a meeting labels May 9, 2019
@MylesBorins MylesBorins deleted the terminology branch October 7, 2020 21:51
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
doc modules-review To be reviewed by team in github thread
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants