Should we lower-case the Nan namespace?

[rvagg]

I'm starting to think that using Nan isn't going to be idiomatic to a lot of people and perhaps we should be opting for nan instead for v2.

Of course I don't want this to hold up progress on getting a release out and I'd love a release within the next day or so, pending documentation being completed, but I also don't want us to be stuck with a decision we regret.

Thoughts @kkoopa, @bnoordhuis, @agnat?

[bnoordhuis]

nan probably conflicts with the function of the same name from <math.h>.

[kkoopa]

Exactly. The current form is the only one without conflicts.

On July 29, 2015 3:31:02 PM EEST, Ben Noordhuis notifications@github.com wrote:

nan probably conflicts with the function of the same name from
<math.h>.

---

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#385 (comment)

[rvagg]

(I feel like I've had this discussion before, sorry for being forgetful if that's the case)