Fix code format in tests #617
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Maybe linters can be introduced to the project? |
|
That is generally a good idea! |
|
We could use clang-format. We can install it like dev dependencies. What do you think? |
|
I have never used clang-format. Most Node.js projects use ESLint for the JS parts, and in core we use cpplint for C++. Seems like we also have a partial ruleset for clang-format, though. |
|
I think this can land while we figure out if we can add linters. |
legendecas
approved these changes
Dec 6, 2019
gabrielschulhof
approved these changes
Dec 14, 2019
gabrielschulhof
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 14, 2019
PR-URL: #617 Reviewed-By: Gabriel Schulhof <gabriel.schulhof@intel.com> Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <legendecas@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
|
Landed in 0e7483e. |
kevindavies8
added a commit
to kevindavies8/node-addon-api-Develop
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 24, 2022
PR-URL: nodejs/node-addon-api#617 Reviewed-By: Gabriel Schulhof <gabriel.schulhof@intel.com> Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <legendecas@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Marlyfleitas
added a commit
to Marlyfleitas/node-api-addon-Development
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 26, 2022
PR-URL: nodejs/node-addon-api#617 Reviewed-By: Gabriel Schulhof <gabriel.schulhof@intel.com> Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <legendecas@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
wroy7860
added a commit
to wroy7860/addon-api-benchmark-node
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 19, 2022
PR-URL: nodejs/node-addon-api#617 Reviewed-By: Gabriel Schulhof <gabriel.schulhof@intel.com> Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <legendecas@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
austinli64
added a commit
to austinli64/node-addon-api
that referenced
this pull request
May 9, 2023
PR-URL: nodejs/node-addon-api#617 Reviewed-By: Gabriel Schulhof <gabriel.schulhof@intel.com> Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <legendecas@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
johnfrench3
pushed a commit
to johnfrench3/node-addon-api-git
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 11, 2023
PR-URL: nodejs/node-addon-api#617 Reviewed-By: Gabriel Schulhof <gabriel.schulhof@intel.com> Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <legendecas@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This fixes a few code formatting issues in
test/.