Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

doc: recommend fh.createWriteStream for fsPromises methods #42653

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 10, 2022

Conversation

aduh95
Copy link
Contributor

@aduh95 aduh95 commented Apr 8, 2022

fh.createWriteStream can be more convenient than fs.createWriteStream when using the FS promises API.

`fh.createWriteStream` can be more convenient than
`fs.createWriteStream` when using the FS promises API.
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations. fs Issues and PRs related to the fs subsystem / file system. labels Apr 8, 2022
@aduh95 aduh95 added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Apr 8, 2022
@aduh95 aduh95 added the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label Apr 10, 2022
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot removed the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label Apr 10, 2022
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot merged commit a82713c into master Apr 10, 2022
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Landed in a82713c

@aduh95 aduh95 deleted the fs-promises-createWriteStream branch April 10, 2022 11:35
xtx1130 pushed a commit to xtx1130/node that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2022
`fh.createWriteStream` can be more convenient than
`fs.createWriteStream` when using the FS promises API.

PR-URL: nodejs#42653
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Akhil Marsonya <akhil.marsonya27@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Mestery <mestery@protonmail.com>
juanarbol pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 31, 2022
`fh.createWriteStream` can be more convenient than
`fs.createWriteStream` when using the FS promises API.

PR-URL: #42653
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Akhil Marsonya <akhil.marsonya27@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Mestery <mestery@protonmail.com>
danielleadams pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 27, 2022
`fh.createWriteStream` can be more convenient than
`fs.createWriteStream` when using the FS promises API.

PR-URL: #42653
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Akhil Marsonya <akhil.marsonya27@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Mestery <mestery@protonmail.com>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 11, 2022
`fh.createWriteStream` can be more convenient than
`fs.createWriteStream` when using the FS promises API.

PR-URL: #42653
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Akhil Marsonya <akhil.marsonya27@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Mestery <mestery@protonmail.com>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2022
`fh.createWriteStream` can be more convenient than
`fs.createWriteStream` when using the FS promises API.

PR-URL: #42653
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Akhil Marsonya <akhil.marsonya27@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Mestery <mestery@protonmail.com>
guangwong pushed a commit to noslate-project/node that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2022
`fh.createWriteStream` can be more convenient than
`fs.createWriteStream` when using the FS promises API.

PR-URL: nodejs/node#42653
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Akhil Marsonya <akhil.marsonya27@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Mestery <mestery@protonmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations. fs Issues and PRs related to the fs subsystem / file system.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants