Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: add test for position validation in fs.read() and fs.readSync() #42837

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 2, 2022

Conversation

LiviaMedeiros
Copy link
Contributor

@LiviaMedeiros LiviaMedeiros commented Apr 23, 2022

This PR adds a test for position validation in fs.read() and fs.readSync() methods.

To be expanded in: #42835 (filehandle.read() and cases where method tries to read bytes beyond int64 limit)

Outdated stuff This PR replaced `EINVAL` from `read(2)` syscall with `RangeError` exception, when `fs.read()` or `fs.readSync()` is called with huge bigint `position`, and adding `length` makes it bigger than `2⁶³ - 1`.
import { openSync, readSync } from 'fs';
const fd = openSync('/mnt/flashdrive/last_digits_of_pi');
const buffer = Buffer.alloc(9);
const result = readSync(fd, buffer, { position: 2n ** 63n - 5n, length: 9 });
node:fs:723
  handleErrorFromBinding(ctx);
  ^

Error: EINVAL: invalid argument, read
    at readSync (node:fs:723:3)
    at file:///tmp/test.mjs:4:16
    at ModuleJob.run (node:internal/modules/esm/module_job:197:25)
    at async Promise.all (index 0)
    at async ESMLoader.import (node:internal/modules/esm/loader:337:24)
    at async loadESM (node:internal/process/esm_loader:88:5)
    at async handleMainPromise (node:internal/modules/run_main:61:12) {
  errno: -22,
  syscall: 'read',
  code: 'EINVAL'
}

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added fs Issues and PRs related to the fs subsystem / file system. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. labels Apr 23, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@aduh95 aduh95 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we add a test?


await testValid(2n ** 63n - 1n - BigInt(length));
await testInvalid('ERR_OUT_OF_RANGE', 2n ** 63n);
await testInvalid('ERR_OUT_OF_RANGE', 2n ** 63n - BigInt(length));
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It looks like passing 2n ** 63n - BigInt(length) works on master (on both the sync and the async version), I'm not seeing any EINVAL error 🤔 maybe it's OS specific or something? If that's the case, it's probably not worth doing it in a separate PR, it's probably easier to land it alongside the other changes as semver-major.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Huh. Well, it definitely depends on read syscall implementation.
I retried this on three Node.js versions:

import { fileURLToPath } from 'url';
import { openSync, readSync } from 'fs';
const fd = openSync(fileURLToPath(import.meta.url));
const buffer = Buffer.alloc(9);
readSync(fd, buffer, { position: 2n ** 63n - 15n, length: 9 }); console.log(buffer); // should work
readSync(fd, buffer, { position: 2n ** 63n - 5n, length: 9 }); console.log(buffer); // might fail with EINVAL
readSync(fd, buffer, { position: 2n ** 63n + 5n, length: 9 }); console.log(buffer); // must fail with exception

v14.17.6 most likely doesn't support bigints and assumes current position so it reads from the start:

<Buffer 69 6d 70 6f 72 74 20 7b 20>
<Buffer 66 69 6c 65 55 52 4c 54 6f>
<Buffer 50 61 74 68 20 7d 20 66 72>

v16.14.1 and master (v19.0.0-pre) both show this:

<Buffer 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00>
node:fs:732
  handleErrorFromBinding(ctx);
  ^

Error: EINVAL: invalid argument, read
    at readSync (node:fs:732:3)
    at file:///tmp/chk.mjs:6:1
    at ModuleJob.run (node:internal/modules/esm/module_job:198:25)
    at async Promise.all (index 0)
    at async ESMLoader.import (node:internal/modules/esm/loader:409:24)
    at async loadESM (node:internal/process/esm_loader:85:5)
    at async handleMainPromise (node:internal/modules/run_main:61:12) {
  errno: -22,
  syscall: 'read',
  code: 'EINVAL'
}

This is on 64bit linux 5.17.0.

If the - 5n line works on any other platform, it is definitely semver-major indeed.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tried v18.0.0 release build on 64bit windows 10.0.18363, same result

>node.exe c:\chk.mjs
<Buffer 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00>
node:fs:732
  handleErrorFromBinding(ctx);
  ^

Error: EINVAL: invalid argument, read
    at readSync (node:fs:732:3)
    at file:///c:/chk.mjs:6:1
    at ModuleJob.run (node:internal/modules/esm/module_job:198:25)
    at async Promise.all (index 0)
    at async ESMLoader.import (node:internal/modules/esm/loader:409:24)
    at async loadESM (node:internal/process/esm_loader:85:5)
    at async handleMainPromise (node:internal/modules/run_main:61:12) {
  errno: -4071,
  syscall: 'read',
  code: 'EINVAL'
}

Node.js v18.0.0

Out of curiosity, on which platform it works successfully?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I’ve tested it on macOS. Could we try to revert the changes in lib, change the test case to catch EINVAL, and run the CI to see which platforms behave like this? (in case that’s just an oddity of my machine or if I’ve tested it wrong somehow)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So it looks like the behavior is indeed platform specific. I suggest we keep in this PR all the tests that pass on master and make the behavior consistent in the other PR that's semver-major.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yep! Can we have one more CI run please? I wanna make sure that testing this part for success and continuing on won't show anything unexpected for these platforms.

Also, results on AIX are bothering: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-commit-aix/40804/nodes=aix72-ppc64/testReport/junit/(root)/test/parallel_test_fs_read_position_validation/
This one reported Error: EFBIG: file too large, read on the test with Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER
I guess there's no choice but to suppress this particular error in testValid.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks a lot.
If I'm reading CI reports correctly, the results were mutually exclusive, except for AIX.
Helper functions got slightly overgeneralized but it should be fine.

@aduh95 aduh95 added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Apr 23, 2022
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Apr 23, 2022
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@aduh95 aduh95 added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Apr 24, 2022
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Apr 24, 2022
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@LiviaMedeiros LiviaMedeiros changed the title fs: replace EINVAL with exception when position + length exceeds int64 limit test: add test for position validation in fs.read() and fs.readSync() Apr 24, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@aduh95 aduh95 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Assuming the CI results are green, that'd be great If you could rebase and update the commit message (otherwise it can be done by whoever lands this PR)

test/parallel/test-fs-read-position-validation.mjs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
@aduh95 aduh95 added author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. labels Apr 24, 2022
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Apr 24, 2022
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@aduh95 aduh95 added the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label May 2, 2022
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot removed the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label May 2, 2022
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the commit-queue-failed An error occurred while landing this pull request using GitHub Actions. label May 2, 2022
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Commit Queue failed
- Loading data for nodejs/node/pull/42837
✔  Done loading data for nodejs/node/pull/42837
----------------------------------- PR info ------------------------------------
Title      test: add test for `position` validation in `fs.read()` and `fs.readSync()` (#42837)
   ⚠  Could not retrieve the email or name of the PR author's from user's GitHub profile!
Branch     LiviaMedeiros:fs-reads-position-einvalfix -> nodejs:master
Labels     fs, author ready, needs-ci
Commits    1
 - test: add test for position validation in fs.read() and fs.readSync()
Committers 1
 - LiviaMedeiros 
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/42837
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel 
------------------------------ Generated metadata ------------------------------
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/42837
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   ℹ  This PR was created on Sat, 23 Apr 2022 11:49:14 GMT
   ✔  Approvals: 1
   ✔  - Antoine du Hamel (@aduh95) (TSC): https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/42837#pullrequestreview-959354525
   ✔  Last GitHub CI successful
   ℹ  Last Full PR CI on 2022-04-24T13:53:02Z: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/43666/
- Querying data for job/node-test-pull-request/43666/
   ✔  Last Jenkins CI successful
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   ✔  No git cherry-pick in progress
   ✔  No git am in progress
   ✔  No git rebase in progress
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Bringing origin/master up to date...
From https://github.com/nodejs/node
 * branch                  master     -> FETCH_HEAD
   acffd3d9e6..916a13a8a3  master     -> origin/master
✔  origin/master is now up-to-date
master is out of sync with origin/master. Mismatched commits:
 - 668380b721 http2: compat support for array headers
 - 916a13a8a3 http2: compat support for array headers
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HEAD is now at 916a13a8a3 http2: compat support for array headers
   ✔  Reset to origin/master
- Downloading patch for 42837
From https://github.com/nodejs/node
 * branch                  refs/pull/42837/merge -> FETCH_HEAD
✔  Fetched commits as 916a13a8a36d..c9054a554940
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[master 548016233f] test: add test for position validation in fs.read() and fs.readSync()
 Author: LiviaMedeiros 
 Date: Sat Apr 23 19:06:45 2022 +0800
 1 file changed, 133 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 test/parallel/test-fs-read-position-validation.mjs
   ✔  Patches applied
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------- New Message ----------------------------------
test: add test for position validation in fs.read() and fs.readSync()

Co-authored-by: Antoine du Hamel duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com

PR-URL: #42837
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com

[master a5d9fd2e47] test: add test for position validation in fs.read() and fs.readSync()
Author: LiviaMedeiros livia@cirno.name
Date: Sat Apr 23 19:06:45 2022 +0800
1 file changed, 133 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 test/parallel/test-fs-read-position-validation.mjs
✖ a5d9fd2e475437aa0d7ffc5248a2d74f49a86cde
✖ 1:0 Co-authored-by must be a trailer co-authored-by-is-trailer
✔ 0:0 skipping fixes-url fixes-url
✔ 0:0 blank line after title line-after-title
✔ 0:0 line-lengths are valid line-length
✔ 0:0 metadata is at end of message metadata-end
✔ 3:8 PR-URL is valid. pr-url
✔ 0:0 reviewers are valid reviewers
✔ 0:0 valid subsystems subsystem
✔ 0:0 Title is formatted correctly. title-format
⚠ 0:50 Title should be <= 50 columns. title-length

ℹ Please fix the commit message and try again.

https://github.com/nodejs/node/actions/runs/2259461302

@aduh95 aduh95 merged commit 6be94c9 into nodejs:master May 2, 2022
@aduh95
Copy link
Contributor

aduh95 commented May 2, 2022

Landed in 6be94c9

RafaelGSS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 10, 2022
PR-URL: #42837
Co-authored-by: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
@RafaelGSS RafaelGSS mentioned this pull request May 10, 2022
juanarbol pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 31, 2022
PR-URL: #42837
Co-authored-by: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
LiviaMedeiros added a commit to LiviaMedeiros/node that referenced this pull request Jun 27, 2022
PR-URL: nodejs#42837
Co-authored-by: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
LiviaMedeiros added a commit to LiviaMedeiros/node that referenced this pull request Jun 27, 2022
PR-URL: nodejs#42837
Co-authored-by: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Backport-PR-URL: nodejs#43588
danielleadams pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 27, 2022
PR-URL: #42837
Co-authored-by: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 12, 2022
PR-URL: #42837
Co-authored-by: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2022
PR-URL: #42837
Co-authored-by: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
guangwong pushed a commit to noslate-project/node that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2022
PR-URL: nodejs/node#42837
Co-authored-by: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. commit-queue-failed An error occurred while landing this pull request using GitHub Actions. fs Issues and PRs related to the fs subsystem / file system. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants