Adding collaborators

[mikeal]

We should create a list of proposed people to add as collaborators and potentially even a few to add as Working Group members. I'd like to see this project move to more of an "OPEN Open Source" contribution model and we've had a ton of people show up recently and do great work.

We may also want to schedule a WG meeting soon.

[fhemberger]

Looking at git shortlog -s -n with contributions > 1:

   175  Frederic Hemberger
    43  Mikeal Rogers
    20  Phillip Johnsen
    19  Rod Vagg
    13  Sean Ouimet
     8  Jeremiah Senkpiel
     7  Divjot Singh
     5  Austin Winstanley
     5  Ben Noordhuis
     5  Evan Lucas
     4  &! (bitandbang)
     4  Thomas Jensen
     4  MassimilianoMura
     3  Rich Trott
     3  Yosuke Furukawa
     3  Max Ogden
     2  paulgrock
     2  andygout
     2  Chayoung You
     2  Francisco Baio Dias
     2  Elin
     2  Trent Oswald
     2  Steven Sinatra
     2  Steve Mao
     2  rnsloan

[mikeal]

In core we consider people with only a single commit as well. If it's more than a trivial change we onboard them as a committer.

[mikeal]

Also, this might be a little more useful since it's got people's GitHub usernames https://github.com/nodejs/new.nodejs.org/graphs/contributors

[mikeal]

Ok, I'm not sure if we need any "onboarding" here, the website is pretty easy to contribute to and the guidelines are written up.

Any objection to adding:

• @bogas04
• @AustinWinstanley
• @evanlucas
• @JungMinu
• @Trott
• @tjconcept
• @thefourtheye
• @yosuke-furukawa
• @MassimilianoMura
• @maxogden
• @yous
• @xicombd
• @andygout
• @mrkiffie
• @rnsloan
• @diagramatics
• @stevemao
• @PatrickHeneise
• @paulgrock
• @srl295
• @lpinca
• @bentinata
• @hoxoa
• @Delapouite
• @s3ththompson
• @narqo
• @csabapalfi
• @marocchino
• @targos
• @silverwind
• @simonmcmanus
• @brycebaril
• @elinnet
• @wonderdogone
• @fabiosantoscode

[silverwind]

Happy to join 👍

[stevemao]

I'm quite happy if I can help 👍

[Delapouite]

Would be my pleasure to contribute again.

[thefourtheye]

I would love that :)

[JungMinu]

Happy to join 😄 Thanks

[s3ththompson]

👍

[fabiosantoscode]

+1

[csabapalfi]

👍

[fbaiodias]

👍

[mrkiffie]

👍

[PatrickHeneise]

Thanks

[elinnet]

[image: 👍]

On 8 October 2015 at 09:28, Patrick Heneise notifications@github.com
wrote:

Thanks

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#181 (comment)
.

[lpinca]

I'm happy to help.

[diagramatics]

👍

[paulgrock]

I'd love to help.

[evanlucas]

Thanks! I'm open to joining :]

[mikeal]

@fhemberger waiting to get a nod from you before I add everyone :)

[srl295]

Thanks for readding me! +1

[fhemberger]

@mikeal I still feel a bit uncertain giving so many people commit rights to master (not because of any of the contributors, I simply don't have any experience with this kind of setup). Is it possible to set up some kind of GitHub workflow? (e.g. changes need to be introduced as PR and need another person to merge them.)

With the next step of adding all translators to the website repo as well, we would have more than 50 people. What do you think?

[mikeal]

@fhemberger ah, I had assumed that we brought over the contribution policy from core but it looks like we are missing it :)

The policy for core is that nobody can merge their own commit, everything is a PR :) I'll send a PR to our README for that.

[thefourtheye]

@fhemberger Ah, I agree. Too many cooks spoil the broth :D I contribute (though I check most of the PRs) only time to time. So, I would like to opt-out.

[fhemberger]

@mikeal Great, thanks.

[bogas04]

Awesome news!
Glad to be part of the project.
Thanks a lot.

Divjot Singh http://bogas04.github.io/
Computer Engineering Undergraduate
Netaji Subhas Institute of Technology,
University of New Delhi

On 08-Oct-2015, at 5:03 AM, Mikeal Rogers notifications@github.com wrote:

Ok, I'm not sure if we need any "onboarding" here, the website is pretty easy to contribute to and the guidelines are written up.

Any objection to adding:

@bogas04 https://github.com/bogas04
@AustinWinstanley https://github.com/AustinWinstanley
@evanlucas https://github.com/evanlucas
@JungMinu https://github.com/JungMinu
@Trott https://github.com/Trott
@tjconcept https://github.com/tjconcept
@thefourtheye https://github.com/thefourtheye
@yosuke-furukawa https://github.com/yosuke-furukawa
@MassimilianoMura https://github.com/MassimilianoMura
@maxogden https://github.com/maxogden
@yous https://github.com/yous
@xicombd https://github.com/xicombd
@andygout https://github.com/andygout
@mrkiffie https://github.com/mrkiffie
@rnsloan https://github.com/rnsloan
@diagramatics https://github.com/diagramatics
@stevemao https://github.com/stevemao
@PatrickHeneise https://github.com/PatrickHeneise
@paulgrock https://github.com/paulgrock
@srl295 https://github.com/srl295
@lpinca https://github.com/lpinca
@bentinata https://github.com/bentinata
@hoxoa https://github.com/hoxoa
@Delapouite https://github.com/Delapouite
@s3ththompson https://github.com/s3ththompson
@narqo https://github.com/narqo
@csabapalfi https://github.com/csabapalfi
@marocchino https://github.com/marocchino
@targos https://github.com/targos
@silverwind https://github.com/silverwind
@simonmcmanus https://github.com/simonmcmanus
@brycebaril https://github.com/brycebaril
@elinnet https://github.com/elinnet
@wonderdogone https://github.com/wonderdogone
@fabiosantoscode https://github.com/fabiosantoscode
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub #181 (comment).

[mikeal]

Ok, #224 this is based on the governance proposal I put up yesterday. Rather than a "TC" model we have an "admin group" which is elected by the full WG. The obvious candidates at this time would be the top 4 or 5 contributors, but we'll need to do that election shortly after we add all these members :)

[AustinWinstanley]

Thanks! I'm definitely open to helping more.

[phillipj]

Great @mikeal! Very happy to get more people on board :)