You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In these overloads call_vm_handler should resolve the correct handler_info which corresponds to the arguments of call_vm_handler such as width, operand count, and override(currently not implemented).
If inline is true, call_vm_handler will generate the handler definition inside of the call_vm_handler. There are many problems with this such as the fact that vm handlers call other vm handlers. This would require a major refactor to how handlers are generated and built.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Describe the solution you'd like
This solution should work with the current implementation of "call_vm_handler".
Currently call_vm_handler is defined like this:
However, this solution would require an overload that is similar to this:
In these overloads call_vm_handler should resolve the correct
handler_info
which corresponds to the arguments of call_vm_handler such as width, operand count, and override(currently not implemented).If
inline
is true, call_vm_handler will generate the handler definition inside of thecall_vm_handler
. There are many problems with this such as the fact that vm handlers call other vm handlers. This would require a major refactor to how handlers are generated and built.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: