Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(module-federation): use single file-server for static remotes #20006

Merged

Conversation

Coly010
Copy link
Contributor

@Coly010 Coly010 commented Nov 2, 2023

  • feat(angular): use a single file server for static remotes
  • feat(module-federation): ensure static remote file server doesn't conflict with dev remote port

Current Behavior

We currently spin up a forked process for every static remote to run a file-server for the remote.

Expected Behavior

We should use a single file-server for all the remotes

Related Issue(s)

Fixes #

@Coly010 Coly010 requested review from a team as code owners November 2, 2023 16:49
@Coly010 Coly010 self-assigned this Nov 2, 2023
Copy link

vercel bot commented Nov 2, 2023

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Updated (UTC)
nx-dev ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview Nov 10, 2023 11:19am

@Coly010 Coly010 force-pushed the feat/module-federation-single-file-server branch 8 times, most recently from 2997e0e to bb84424 Compare November 8, 2023 12:24
@Coly010 Coly010 force-pushed the feat/module-federation-single-file-server branch from bb84424 to f43120e Compare November 8, 2023 16:11
@Coly010 Coly010 merged commit a73e9fd into nrwl:master Nov 10, 2023
6 checks passed
@Coly010 Coly010 deleted the feat/module-federation-single-file-server branch November 13, 2023 10:44
Copy link

This pull request has already been merged/closed. If you experience issues related to these changes, please open a new issue referencing this pull request.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 19, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants