New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Please add support for OpenRISC/or1k architecture #4743
Comments
Patch:
|
Hi @manuelafm, thanks for the patch. Would you care to submit this as a pull request? If you're not set up for that, I can send one. |
anything special about the platform? |
@rgommers: I would appreciate if you could do it, I will not have access to computers with good bandwidth for a few days. @juliantaylor: it's 32 bits and big endian, similar to mips (MIPSEB). I don't know many details about the architecture, but a person with more knowledge of this told me (see link to Debian bug report at the start of this thread) that the implementation details provided for other arches should work for this one. I will forward the questions to him just in case, but if you don't receive more info about this, assume that the provided patch is enough. Thanks. |
BLD: add support for OpenRISC architecture. Closes gh-4743.
Forwarding the bug from Debian:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=749195
Hi,
The patch provided (against version 1.8.1-1) allows to get this package compiled in OpenRISC/or1k architecture that Christian and I are creating in Debian.
After installing python-numpy and python-nose, most of the unit tests seem to pass, and the ones that do not pass might be due to underlying problems in blas or others (e.g. threading issues in the platform) that we still have to work out.
Cheers.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: