Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Switch to the PyPI version of plex to generate lapack_lite #8377

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Dec 29, 2016

Conversation

eric-wieser
Copy link
Member

The previous version, 1.1.4, was not even packaged with a setup.py, making installation harder. Now it can just be installed (manually) from PIP.

This was tested with the lapack 3.0.0 source (not the debian lapack3 package as was used before), and was found to have identical output before and after this changeset.

@eric-wieser
Copy link
Member Author

eric-wieser commented Dec 13, 2016

This now runs correctly on python 2, whereas before it did not run at all

Note that plex uses the <> operator, so does not work at all on python 3 anyway

@eric-wieser
Copy link
Member Author

This should be good to review now

@rgommers
Copy link
Member

does not work at all on python 3 anyway

Could you add that prominently at the top of README?

Changes look good to me.

@@ -2,11 +2,10 @@
from __future__ import division, absolute_import, print_function

import sys, os
from io import StringIO
from io import BytesIO as StringIO
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could we just use BytesIO instead of StringIO?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oops, thought I hadn't left that in

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done

@charris
Copy link
Member

charris commented Dec 29, 2016

Shame that Plex seems to be abandonware since 2009-12-06. It will probably never be made Python3 compatible.

@eric-wieser
Copy link
Member Author

Could you add that prominently at the top of README?

It's now in there in various places

@rgommers rgommers merged commit 3add9ed into numpy:master Dec 29, 2016
@rgommers
Copy link
Member

Merged, thanks @eric-wieser

@rgommers rgommers added this to the 1.13.0 release milestone Dec 29, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants