Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Export to ASM; Please support CA65 #166

Closed
wbochar opened this issue Sep 29, 2019 · 4 comments
Closed

Export to ASM; Please support CA65 #166

wbochar opened this issue Sep 29, 2019 · 4 comments

Comments

@wbochar
Copy link

wbochar commented Sep 29, 2019

Export to ASM; Please support CA65
You have everyone but CA65, ad really it's simple to add.

@nurpax
Copy link
Owner

nurpax commented Sep 30, 2019

As a non-ca65 user, I'm not sure what syntax are you looking for. Something like:

; comments
.byte 45,24,13

If you can send a working sample, I'll integrate. I'm going to implement this by adding some sort of syntax template support into Petmate so that it can be configured to pretty much output any combination of these different syntaxes.

@wbochar
Copy link
Author

wbochar commented Sep 30, 2019

That example is good, thanks.
Also, can you include byte HEX/DEC options? I read HEX easier when it comes to c64 chars.

@nurpax
Copy link
Owner

nurpax commented Sep 30, 2019

Most people still using C64 these days probably read HEX better. ;)

nurpax added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 18, 2019
Export in c64jasm format always.  Regexp mangle for other
assembler syntaxes.

Add support for setting up a non-ROM charset.

for #166
nurpax added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 19, 2019
Also add support for custom fonts.

Export now constructs the output .asm in c64jasm syntax, and then
regexp converts that to target syntax.  This simplifies export code
quite a bit.

for #166
@nurpax
Copy link
Owner

nurpax commented Feb 2, 2020

Supported in 0.8.1.

@nurpax nurpax closed this as completed Feb 2, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants