eslint: Prefer const over let

[manniL]

Yes, after #3630 this is another consistent code style PR. To make the code more uniform, I'd suggest preferring const over let. Also, you know then that those variables will never be reassigned.

In the end, it's a matter of opinions again, it'd be also fine to go for let over const.

[codecov-io]

Codecov Report

Merging #3650 into dev will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100%.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##              dev    #3650   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.19%   99.19%           
=======================================
  Files          18       18           
  Lines        1123     1123           
  Branches      302      302           
=======================================
  Hits         1114     1114           
  Misses          9        9

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
lib/builder/webpack/base.js	100% <100%> (ø)	⬆️
lib/builder/builder.js	100% <100%> (ø)	⬆️
lib/builder/generator.js	94.23% <100%> (ø)	⬆️
lib/builder/webpack/utils/postcss.js	100% <100%> (ø)	⬆️
lib/core/nuxt.js	98.82% <100%> (ø)	⬆️
lib/common/utils.js	100% <100%> (ø)	⬆️
lib/core/middleware/error.js	97.56% <100%> (ø)	⬆️
lib/core/renderer.js	100% <100%> (ø)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 823c298...ae2d583. Read the comment docs.

[clarkdo]

LGTM

[Atinux]

Nice, our Eslintrc is becoming better and better now!

[lock]

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.