Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Realsense Firmware for vslam and nvblox #90

Closed
ikhann opened this issue Jan 22, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

Realsense Firmware for vslam and nvblox #90

ikhann opened this issue Jan 22, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
verify to close Waiting on confirm issue is resolved

Comments

@ikhann
Copy link

ikhann commented Jan 22, 2024

Hi!

I am planning to use isaac_ros_visual_slam in conjunction with isaac_ros_nvblox, and I'm using the Realsense D435 camera for this setup. However, I've encountered a bit of a dilemma regarding the firmware version compatibility between these two ROS packages and the Realsense camera.

The isaac_ros_visual_slam Troubleshooting Suggestions advise that the firmware of the RealSense camera should be 5.14.0 or newer. This seems straightforward, but there's a conflicting recommendation for isaac_ros_nvblox.

For isaac_ros_nvblox, the documentation indicates it has been tested and found compatible with RealSense camera firmware version 5.13.0.50. More so, there's a specific note in the nvblox examples stating, "The latest RealSense firmware (version 5.14 at the time of publishing) might have issues. Our recommendation is to install exactly version 5.13.0.50".

Given these conflicting recommendations, I'm unsure which firmware version to use for optimal performance and compatibility with both isaac_ros_visual_slam and isaac_ros_nvblox.
Could you provide guidance on which firmware version would be the best choice in this situation?

Thank you!

@jaiveersinghNV jaiveersinghNV added the verify to close Waiting on confirm issue is resolved label Jan 29, 2024
@jaiveersinghNV
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @ikhann - I believe we've responded to your Developer Forum thread already, but for the sake of closure on this issue, I'll duplicate our response here:

We suggest to use version 5.13.0.50

@ikhann
Copy link
Author

ikhann commented Jan 29, 2024

Hi @ikhann - I believe we've responded to your Developer Forum thread already, but for the sake of closure on this issue, I'll duplicate our response here:

We suggest to use version 5.13.0.50

Indeed! Thank you for your help!

@ikhann ikhann closed this as completed Jan 29, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
verify to close Waiting on confirm issue is resolved
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants