Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🚨 [security] [ruby] Update rails: 7.0.4.2 → 7.0.4.3 (patch) #33

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 15, 2023

Conversation

depfu[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@depfu depfu bot commented Mar 15, 2023


🚨 Your current dependencies have known security vulnerabilities 🚨

This dependency update fixes known security vulnerabilities. Please see the details below and assess their impact carefully. We recommend to merge and deploy this as soon as possible!


Here is everything you need to know about this update. Please take a good look at what changed and the test results before merging this pull request.

What changed?

✳️ rails (7.0.4.2 → 7.0.4.3) · Repo

Release Notes

7.0.4.3

Active Support

Active Model

  • No changes.

Active Record

  • No changes.

Action View

  • Ignore certain data-* attributes in rails-ujs when element is contenteditable

    [CVE-2023-23913]

Action Pack

  • No changes.

Active Job

  • No changes.

Action Mailer

  • No changes.

Action Cable

  • No changes.

Active Storage

  • No changes.

Action Mailbox

  • No changes.

Action Text

  • No changes.

Railties

  • No changes.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 3 commits:

↗️ actioncable (indirect, 7.0.4.2 → 7.0.4.3) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

7.0.4.3 (from changelog)

  • No changes.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 3 commits:

↗️ actionmailbox (indirect, 7.0.4.2 → 7.0.4.3) · Repo · Changelog

↗️ actionmailer (indirect, 7.0.4.2 → 7.0.4.3) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

7.0.4.3 (from changelog)

  • No changes.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 3 commits:

↗️ actionpack (indirect, 7.0.4.2 → 7.0.4.3) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

7.0.4.3 (from changelog)

  • No changes.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 3 commits:

↗️ actiontext (indirect, 7.0.4.2 → 7.0.4.3) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

7.0.4.3 (from changelog)

  • No changes.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 3 commits:

↗️ actionview (indirect, 7.0.4.2 → 7.0.4.3) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

7.0.4.3 (from changelog)

  • Ignore certain data-* attributes in rails-ujs when element is contenteditable

    [CVE-2023-23913]

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 3 commits:

↗️ activejob (indirect, 7.0.4.2 → 7.0.4.3) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

7.0.4.3 (from changelog)

  • No changes.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 3 commits:

↗️ activemodel (indirect, 7.0.4.2 → 7.0.4.3) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

7.0.4.3 (from changelog)

  • No changes.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 3 commits:

↗️ activerecord (indirect, 7.0.4.2 → 7.0.4.3) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

7.0.4.3 (from changelog)

  • No changes.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 3 commits:

↗️ activestorage (indirect, 7.0.4.2 → 7.0.4.3) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

7.0.4.3 (from changelog)

  • No changes.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 3 commits:

↗️ activesupport (indirect, 7.0.4.2 → 7.0.4.3) · Repo · Changelog

Security Advisories 🚨

🚨 Possible XSS Security Vulnerability in SafeBuffer#bytesplice

There is a vulnerability in ActiveSupport if the new bytesplice method is called on a SafeBuffer with untrusted user input.
This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2023-28120.

Versions Affected: All. Not affected: None Fixed Versions: 7.0.4.3, 6.1.7.3

Impact

ActiveSupport uses the SafeBuffer string subclass to tag strings as html_safe after they have been sanitized.
When these strings are mutated, the tag is should be removed to mark them as no longer being html_safe.

Ruby 3.2 introduced a new bytesplice method which ActiveSupport did not yet understand to be a mutation.
Users on older versions of Ruby are likely unaffected.

All users running an affected release and using bytesplice should either upgrade or use one of the workarounds immediately.

Workarounds

Avoid calling bytesplice on a SafeBuffer (html_safe) string with untrusted user input.

Release Notes

7.0.4.3 (from changelog)

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 3 commits:

↗️ concurrent-ruby (indirect, 1.2.0 → 1.2.2) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

1.2.2

concurrent-ruby 1.2.2:

  • (#993) Fix arguments passed to Concurrent::Map's default_proc.

1.2.1

concurrent-ruby 1.2.1:

  • (#990) Add missing require 'fiber' for FiberLocalVar.
  • (#989) Optimize Concurrent::Map#[] on CRuby by letting the backing Hash handle the default_proc.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 16 commits:

↗️ minitest (indirect, 5.17.0 → 5.18.0) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

5.18.0 (from changelog)

  • 2 major enhancements:

    • Added assert_pattern & refute_pattern for pattern matching. (flavorjones)

    • Added matching must_pattern_match & wont_pattern_match to minitest/spec.

  • 1 bug fix:

    • Support the new message format of NameError in Ruby 3.3 (mame)

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 7 commits:

↗️ rack-test (indirect, 2.0.2 → 2.1.0) · Repo · Changelog

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ railties (indirect, 7.0.4.2 → 7.0.4.3) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

7.0.4.3 (from changelog)

  • No changes.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 3 commits:


Depfu Status

Depfu will automatically keep this PR conflict-free, as long as you don't add any commits to this branch yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting with @depfu rebase.

All Depfu comment commands
@​depfu rebase
Rebases against your default branch and redoes this update
@​depfu recreate
Recreates this PR, overwriting any edits that you've made to it
@​depfu merge
Merges this PR once your tests are passing and conflicts are resolved
@​depfu close
Closes this PR and deletes the branch
@​depfu reopen
Restores the branch and reopens this PR (if it's closed)
@​depfu pause
Ignores all future updates for this dependency and closes this PR
@​depfu pause [minor|major]
Ignores all future minor/major updates for this dependency and closes this PR
@​depfu resume
Future versions of this dependency will create PRs again (leaves this PR as is)

@depfu depfu bot added the depfu label Mar 15, 2023
@gdiggs gdiggs merged commit cf17a09 into main Mar 15, 2023
@gdiggs gdiggs deleted the depfu/update/group/rails-7.0.4.3 branch March 15, 2023 03:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant