X.590 signatures #430
Merged
X.590 signatures #430
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
davaya
approved these changes
Dec 13, 2023
|
Approved at 13 December working meeting. No objections raised to "lazy consensus email". Merging. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Note: ITU-T is still in the process of publishing X.590; this PR is based on a pre-published version supplied by Bret Jordan.
Replace the currently specified use of JSON Web Signatures (RFC 7515) with the newly approved ITU-T X.590 JSON Signature Scheme (JSS) which is a much better fit for OpenC2 requirements.
This PR removes the signature example in E.3. If / when suitable tooling is located to create a JSS example an appropriate PR will be created. In the interim, ITU-T X.590 contains clear examples.