Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

3.0.0 ChangeLog release #639

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jan 7, 2019
Merged

3.0.0 ChangeLog release #639

merged 5 commits into from
Jan 7, 2019

Conversation

JonathanHuot
Copy link
Member

@JonathanHuot JonathanHuot commented Dec 28, 2018

If accepted, tag a 3.0.0 and trigger a new package build/deployment.

See #619 .

New graph for understanding the OAuth2.0 Provider flow as been added. Graph has been written in dot language. See png output here:
image
image

@JonathanHuot JonathanHuot added this to the 3.0.0 milestone Dec 28, 2018
@JonathanHuot JonathanHuot self-assigned this Dec 28, 2018
Copy link
Collaborator

@thedrow thedrow left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We need to highlight breaking changes to avoid breaking clients.

CHANGELOG.rst Show resolved Hide resolved
CHANGELOG.rst Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@skion skion left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Excellent work on the flow diagram, should deserve a prominent spot in the developer docs IMO.

@JonathanHuot JonathanHuot merged commit 9dfa40c into master Jan 7, 2019
@JonathanHuot JonathanHuot deleted the 3-release branch January 7, 2019 21:19
JonathanHuot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 8, 2019
I fixed graphviz missing output to web responses (see image of #639), and I have added a fixed rank (`rank=same`) when functions are achieving an identical goal. E.g. `validate_client_id`, `validate_user`, `validate_bearer_token` are unique for each flows, or, e.g. `confirm_redirect_uri`, `validate_redirect_uri` together, and so on.

![graphviz-0cc58e8637b94d7402eda45a1fef6e68889bd8e1](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/820496/50830407-042ad600-1348-11e9-936a-03d07f42494f.png)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants