-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Requesting CPATH related OBA traits #191
Comments
@matentzn I couldn't find comparable terms in Uberon for fine-motor/eye-hand and two of the motor terms from NBO are already being used by Uberon. <style> </style>
|
Excellent @Daniel-Olson
All the values in this column should be Uberon - what anatomical system is meant when we say "motor coordination"? Skeletal system? Muscular system? Any anatomical part? Any muscle? Any limb? When you are done with the above, can you (maybe with Emily's help) make a PR adding these new terms in the appropriate columns here: https://github.com/obophenotype/bio-attribute-ontology/blob/master/src/patterns/data/default/entity_attribute.tsv Note that it is important that the diff of that file really only encompasses your added rows (not all rows, because for example, you change the line endings or something). |
@matentzn the motor/eye-hand coordination terms were originally subclasses of upper/lower limb coordination but as the mapping template evolved they were deprecated. So we can map them broadly to the terms below for potential future use or it might make the most sense to just leave them out for now and worry about them if they ever resurface? <style> </style>
|
I think this is reasonable (leaving them out for now). The mapping also looks good. I think you are ready to make a PR now, as described in my previous comment! |
Thanks @matentzn! I have a few questions:
|
Change to OBA IDs.
Make a PR here: https://github.com/obophenotype/bio-attribute-ontology/blob/master/src/ontology/oba-idranges.owl, copy an existing range and adopt it to assign yourself one as well. Once the PR is there, I can fix it for you, so don't worry about making mistakes!
No its fine, the terms you request are pretty standard OBA, no need for a detailed issue. Thanks! |
The NBO:0000339 motor coordination definition looks correct to me, because motor coordination is a process. It is this process that should bear the quality, not the anatomical entities. The anatomical entities like the hand, eye limbs are just participants in the process. Anatomical entities can be bearers of the other PATO qualities in the table above. |
@rays22 thank you for your excellent and careful review. How would you define |
Ok. it seems unfortunate that we cant use Uberon terms to define these, but maybe it is ok for now. Could you redefine the coordination traits using the pattern you suggest? |
Yes, I could. I would use the quality PATO:0015002 process efficacy. |
Interesting! Ok! Let's do it, and see how others react when they come across this, and maybe check MP, ZP and HP if they make use of the NBO terms in their defs. It seems we should be compatible with whatever they are doing :) THANKS! |
@Daniel-Olson
Can you provide:
I will deal with politics around NBO.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: