Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OBA contains multiple labels for terms #32

Closed
balhoff opened this issue May 15, 2019 · 4 comments
Closed

OBA contains multiple labels for terms #32

balhoff opened this issue May 15, 2019 · 4 comments

Comments

@balhoff
Copy link
Member

balhoff commented May 15, 2019

OBA has six terms that have two rdfs:labels. Can I just manually edit to move one to be a synonym? Or is there a template system in use? Example:

Term]
id: OBA:1000078
name: attribute of organelle
name: organelle attribute
def: "The quality of a organelle." [AUTO:patterns/patterns/entity_attribute]
synonym: "organelle quality trait" EXACT [GOC:TermGenie]
synonym: "quality of organelle" EXACT [AUTO:patterns/patterns/entity_attribute]
is_a: OBA:0100001 ! cellular component attribute
intersection_of: PATO:0000001
intersection_of: inheres_in GO:0043226
relationship: inheres_in GO:0043226
created_by: cjmungall
creation_date: 2014-06-04T19:24:13Z
@cmungall
Copy link
Member

cmungall commented May 16, 2019 via email

@balhoff
Copy link
Member Author

balhoff commented May 16, 2019

This relates to geneontology/go-ontology#17263

@balhoff
Copy link
Member Author

balhoff commented May 16, 2019

Is there an action that I can take? In oba-edit.obo it looks like this (one label):

[Term]
id: OBA:1000078
name: organelle attribute
synonym: "organelle quality trait" EXACT [GOC:TermGenie]
created_by: cjmungall
creation_date: 2014-06-04T19:24:13Z

cmungall added a commit that referenced this issue May 17, 2019
@matentzn
Copy link
Contributor

This must have been fixed a long time.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants