Merge CL:0000000 cell and GO:0005623 cell, UBERON:0000470 cell part and GO:0044464 cell part

[fbastian]

Present in the ontology:

GO:0005575 cellular_component
    CL:0000000 cell
        UBERON:0000470 cell part
        CL:0000003 native cell
    GO:0005623 cell
        CL:0001034 cell in vitro
        GO:0044464 cell part
        CL:0000003 native cell

[cmungall]

We can merge the GO and CL classes in the composite ontologies

We generally don't merge classes outside these, but we could consider
merging in ext in this one case. However, it's better to fix upstream.
My position is that it is best to obsolete CL:0000000 and replace it
with the more spatially inclusive GO:0005575.

UBERON:0000470 is legacy and needs to go away

On 18 Jun 2014, at 21:51, fbastian wrote:

Present in the ontology:

GO:0005575 cellular_component
  CL:0000000 cell
      UBERON:0000470 cell part
      CL:0000003 native cell
  GO:0005623 cell
      CL:0001034 cell in vitro
      GO:0044464 cell part
      CL:0000003 native cell

---

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#489

[fbastian]

Problem still present.

[cmungall]

https://code.google.com/p/cell-ontology/issues/detail?id=148

[gouttegd]

WARNING: This issue has been automatically closed because it has not been updated in more than 3 years. Please re-open it if you still need this to be addressed addressed addressed – we are now getting some resources to deal with such issues.