New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Pythonic bitinformation #126
Conversation
c1485c6
to
e3f5512
Compare
f588c7d
to
f683884
Compare
This branch is now in a state where the basic functionality of However, the following features are still missing in the python implementation and should be added in a next step:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great work. Wasn’t expecting to see identical result from Julia and pythonic implementation. The main issue I see is that this means duplication of bitinformation.jl, I.e. each change there should be done here as well. On the other hand we could make julia and bitinformation.jl an optional install.
I second that the duplication is not ideal and I would like to avoid it, but currently it seems (at least to me) the easiest way to allow for larger datasets. |
julia stays the default. |
Yes!! |
This is work-in-progress for a pythonic way to retrieve the mutual information content.