Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make use of the [@@immediate] information when checking [@@unboxed] #1469

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 10, 2017

Conversation

damiendoligez
Copy link
Member

When checking whether the [@@unboxed] annotation on a type is acceptable, we can make use of the information given by [@@immediate] annotations on other types.

Suggested by Stephan Muenzel.

See also MPR#7511 GPR#606 GPR#1133.

@damiendoligez damiendoligez force-pushed the unboxed-immediate-type branch 2 times, most recently from 73d840e to 2306e60 Compare November 8, 2017 13:45
@alainfrisch
Copy link
Contributor

(Also related to #1262.)

Copy link
Contributor

@alainfrisch alainfrisch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Member

@gasche gasche left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Someone has to update the Changes entry before this gets merged. @alainfrisch, are you planning to merge now?

@gasche
Copy link
Member

gasche commented Dec 10, 2017

I just rebased the PR and will merge in trunk if the CI passes.

@gasche gasche merged commit 7a7bf05 into ocaml:trunk Dec 10, 2017
trefis added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 25, 2017
@trefis
Copy link
Contributor

trefis commented Dec 25, 2017

Seems like you had forgotten the Changes update before merging.
I pushed 1707e24 to fix that.

@damiendoligez damiendoligez deleted the unboxed-immediate-type branch February 22, 2018 14:28
EmileTrotignon pushed a commit to EmileTrotignon/ocaml that referenced this pull request Jan 12, 2024
---------

Co-authored-by: Sabine Schmaltz <sabineschmaltz@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants