ppopt and ppxopt options #45
Labels
Comments
|
Indeed; a pull request would be warmly welcome. |
|
Duplicate of #190, which has more context. |
|
I've just encountered this issue: lwt docs say I can specify -ppxopt lwt.ppx,-no-debug but when compiling with ppxopt(lwt.ppx,-no-debug) I get "Warning: tag "ppxopt" does not expect a parameter, but is used with parameter "lwt.ppx,-no-debug". |
|
Thanks for the (reiterated) request, I proposed an implementation in #265. |
Merged
gasche
added a commit
to gasche/opam-repository
that referenced
this issue
Sep 8, 2018
OCamlbuild 0.13.0 contains new features (`ppopt(..)` and `ppxopt(...)` flags, ocamlbuild options) and bugfixes (to pack production, for 4.08+dev support). - ocaml/ocamlbuild#45, ocaml/ocamlbuild#190: add ppopt(arg) and ppxopt(package,arg) when -use-ocamlfind (Gabriel Scherer, review by whitequark, request by Gabriel Scherer, Gabriel Radanne and Pavel Argentov) - ocaml/ocamlbuild#268, ocaml/ocamlbuild#269: add flag support for some ocamlmklib options: custom, debug, failsafe, linkall, ccopt(..), cclib(..), rpath(..), ldopt(..) (Gabriel Scherer, report by Hannes Mehnert, review by whitequark) * ocaml/ocamlbuild#272: add the "link" tag to "pack" actions Instead of a separate category, "pack" is now another form of linking like "program", "library", "toplevel" and "output_obj". This fixes the issue that package(...) tags where not passed at pack-production time, spotted by Jérémie Dimino. More generally, this extends the meaning of all "link" flags to "pack", which seems to be the correct behavior for all the rules we inspected. (Gabriel Scherer, original issue diagnosis by Jérémie Dimino) - ocaml/ocamlbuild#278: typo fixes in the manual (Xinzhe Yang) - ocaml/ocamlbuild#282: fix compilation with trunk OCaml (4.08+dev) (Xavier Clerc and Nandor Licker)
gasche
added a commit
to gasche/opam-repository
that referenced
this issue
Sep 14, 2018
OCamlbuild 0.13.0 contains new features (`ppopt(..)` and `ppxopt(...)` flags, ocamlbuild options) and bugfixes (to pack production, for 4.08+dev support). - ocaml/ocamlbuild#45, ocaml/ocamlbuild#190: add ppopt(arg) and ppxopt(package,arg) when -use-ocamlfind (Gabriel Scherer, review by whitequark, request by Gabriel Scherer, Gabriel Radanne and Pavel Argentov) - ocaml/ocamlbuild#268, ocaml/ocamlbuild#269: add flag support for some ocamlmklib options: custom, debug, failsafe, linkall, ccopt(..), cclib(..), rpath(..), ldopt(..) (Gabriel Scherer, report by Hannes Mehnert, review by whitequark) * ocaml/ocamlbuild#272: add the "link" tag to "pack" actions Instead of a separate category, "pack" is now another form of linking like "program", "library", "toplevel" and "output_obj". This fixes the issue that package(...) tags where not passed at pack-production time, spotted by Jérémie Dimino. More generally, this extends the meaning of all "link" flags to "pack", which seems to be the correct behavior for all the rules we inspected. (Gabriel Scherer, original issue diagnosis by Jérémie Dimino) - ocaml/ocamlbuild#278: typo fixes in the manual (Xinzhe Yang) - ocaml/ocamlbuild#282: fix compilation with trunk OCaml (4.08+dev) (Xavier Clerc and Nandor Licker)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
It doesn't seem possible to add these ocamlfind options in the
_tagfileThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: