Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Package vscoq-language-server.2.0.0+coq8.18 #24452

Conversation

vscoqbot
Copy link
Contributor

vscoq-language-server.2.0.0+coq8.18

VSCoq language server
LSP based language server for Coq and its VSCoq user interface



🐫 Pull-request generated by opam-publish v2.0.3

…8.18/opam

Co-authored-by: Karl Palmskog <palmskog@gmail.com>
…8.18/opam

Co-authored-by: Enrico Tassi <Enrico.Tassi@inria.fr>
@gares
Copy link
Contributor

gares commented Sep 18, 2023

CI looks good now.
The two failures on 32 bit systems will be addressed upstream with another realease I guess.

…8.18/opam

Co-authored-by: Enrico Tassi <Enrico.Tassi@inria.fr>
@gares
Copy link
Contributor

gares commented Sep 19, 2023

Damn, jsonrpc 1.12 does not work, I've the impression there are two Pp modules in scope.
So we should raise the lower bound apparently, but I could not really figure out the correct value.
We could try 1.15, according to the changelog it should not be too picky.

…8.18/opam

Co-authored-by: Enrico Tassi <Enrico.Tassi@inria.fr>
@rtetley
Copy link

rtetley commented Sep 19, 2023

What can we do to get this PR merged ? The remaining errors can only be fixed upstream

@gares
Copy link
Contributor

gares commented Sep 19, 2023

Yes please consider this for merge. An upcoming release will relax some constraint, but in the meantime this one will unblock some users.

@maximedenes
Copy link
Contributor

@rtetley Should this be closed in favor of #24486 ?

@rtetley
Copy link

rtetley commented Sep 20, 2023

@rtetley Should this be closed in favor of #24486 ?

Yup

@vscoqbot vscoqbot closed this Sep 20, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants