Package ocaml-compiler-libs.v0.17.0

[public-release]

ocaml-compiler-libs.v0.17.0

OCaml compiler libraries repackaged
This packages exposes the OCaml compiler libraries repackages under
the toplevel names Ocaml_common, Ocaml_bytecomp, Ocaml_optcomp, ...

---

• Homepage: https://github.com/janestreet/ocaml-compiler-libs
• Source repo: git+https://github.com/janestreet/ocaml-compiler-libs.git
• Bug tracker: https://github.com/janestreet/ocaml-compiler-libs/issues

---

🐫 Pull-request generated by opam-publish v2.3.0

[dkalinichenko-js]

Ah, there's no CI for OCaml 5.2 yet. @hhugo should we still release this package version before OCaml 5.2 is out? I understand ppxlib on 5.2 depends on this.

[hhugo]

With this release, one just need to pin ppxlib to the right version. So I'm in favor.for such release. Maybe one should add an upper bound on the ocaml version to older release of ocaml-compiler-libs.

@kit-ty-kate what do you think ?

[kit-ty-kate]

@hhugo i was waiting for the first alpha to look at the failures on 5.2 properly but yes it seems that all previous versions of ocaml-compiler-libs are incompatible with 5.2 so an upper-bound should be added indeed.

As for CI, I’m not responsible for that or for opam-repository maintainance anymore but i encourage you to open a ticket in https://github.com/ocaml/infrastructure/issues to ask that 5.2 be added to the test matrix. However in the meantime a manual check by the opam-repository maintainers should suffice (even more as 5.2 is not released yet)

[mseri]

@dkalinichenko-js is it possible to add the upper bounds either here (or in a separate PR)? I'd like to merge that when merging this

[dkalinichenko-js]

@mseri ping

[mseri]

Oh, thanks a lot! I had missed the new commit!

[hhugo]

Thank you