New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[FIX] base: profiling qweb field visibility #107051
Conversation
1369495
to
fd5f4a0
Compare
hi @Julien00859 , |
Hello @niyasraphy funny enough I was already reviewing this PR at the moment you sent the message :) I'm going through all my missed notifications so do not worry, if rd-framework-py is notified, I'll review the PR at some point ;) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@robodoo r+
closes #107051 Signed-off-by: Julien Castiaux <juc@odoo.com>
@niyasraphy @Julien00859 this pull request has forward-port PRs awaiting action (not merged or closed): |
@niyasraphy @Julien00859 this pull request has forward-port PRs awaiting action (not merged or closed): |
2 similar comments
@niyasraphy @Julien00859 this pull request has forward-port PRs awaiting action (not merged or closed): |
@niyasraphy @Julien00859 this pull request has forward-port PRs awaiting action (not merged or closed): |
Description of the issue/feature this PR addresses: in ir.profile model currently the qweb field is not getting invisible when the value is empty.
Settings -> Technical -> Database Structure -> Profiling
Current behavior before PR: field is not getting invisible when there is no value
Desired behavior after PR is merged: field will be invisible when there is no value
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr