Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FW][FIX] point_of_sale: fix memory error #124363

Conversation

fw-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@fw-bot fw-bot commented Jun 8, 2023

When there are too many (millions) of POS order lines associated to opened POS sessions we get too many taxes, most are duplicated. This causes a MemoryError.

Example queries from a real DB:

> select count(distinct r.account_tax_id) from pos_order_line l join pos_order o on o.id = l.order_id join pos_session s on s.id = o.session_id join account_tax_pos_order_line_rel r on r.pos_order_line_id = l.id where s.state != 'closed'
+-------+
| count |
|-------|
| 24    |
+-------+
> select count(r.account_tax_id) from pos_order_line l join pos_order o on o.id = l.order_id join pos_session s on s.id = o.session_id join account_tax_pos_order_line_rel r on r.pos_order_line_id = l.id where s.state != 'closed'
+---------+
| count   |
|---------|
| 2504539 |
+---------+

opw-3295467

Forward-Port-Of: #124194
Forward-Port-Of: #124119

When there are too many (millions) of POS order lines associated to
opened POS sessions we get too many taxes, most are duplicated. This
causes a MemorryError.

Example queries from a real DB:
```
> select count(distinct r.account_tax_id) from pos_order_line l join pos_order o on o.id = l.order_id join pos_session s on s.id = o.session_id join account_tax_pos_order_line_rel r on r.pos_order_
 line_id = l.id where s.state != 'closed'
+-------+
| count |
|-------|
| 24    |
+-------+
> select count(r.account_tax_id) from pos_order_line l join pos_order o on o.id = l.order_id join pos_session s on s.id = o.session_id join account_tax_pos_order_line_rel r on r.pos_order_line_id =
  l.id where s.state != 'closed'
+---------+
| count   |
|---------|
| 2504539 |
+---------+
```

opw-3295467

X-original-commit: 14ff7de
@robodoo
Copy link
Contributor

robodoo commented Jun 8, 2023

@fw-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

fw-bot commented Jun 8, 2023

This PR targets saas-15.2 and is part of the forward-port chain. Further PRs will be created up to master.

More info at https://github.com/odoo/odoo/wiki/Mergebot#forward-port

@robodoo robodoo added the forwardport This PR was created by @fw-bot label Jun 8, 2023
@C3POdoo C3POdoo added the OE the report is linked to a support ticket (opw-...) label Jun 8, 2023
robodoo pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 9, 2023
When there are too many (millions) of POS order lines associated to
opened POS sessions we get too many taxes, most are duplicated. This
causes a MemorryError.

Example queries from a real DB:
```
> select count(distinct r.account_tax_id) from pos_order_line l join pos_order o on o.id = l.order_id join pos_session s on s.id = o.session_id join account_tax_pos_order_line_rel r on r.pos_order_
 line_id = l.id where s.state != 'closed'
+-------+
| count |
|-------|
| 24    |
+-------+
> select count(r.account_tax_id) from pos_order_line l join pos_order o on o.id = l.order_id join pos_session s on s.id = o.session_id join account_tax_pos_order_line_rel r on r.pos_order_line_id =
  l.id where s.state != 'closed'
+---------+
| count   |
|---------|
| 2504539 |
+---------+
```

opw-3295467

closes #124363

X-original-commit: 14ff7de
Signed-off-by: Christophe Simonis (chs) <chs@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Alvaro Fuentes Suarez (afu) <afu@odoo.com>
@robodoo robodoo temporarily deployed to merge June 9, 2023 09:47 Inactive
@robodoo robodoo closed this Jun 9, 2023
@fw-bot fw-bot deleted the saas-15.2-saas-12.3-fix_mem_error-afu-O88Y-fw branch June 23, 2023 10:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
forwardport This PR was created by @fw-bot OE the report is linked to a support ticket (opw-...)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants