[FW][FIX] base, website: include inherit_branding_auto in t-cache keys #156081
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
When QWeb templates became cached and compiled in [1], the list of default cache key elements did not contain `inherit_branding_auto` (but it included the old `inherit_branding`). Because of this the cache was shared between restricted editors and public users, which could lead to problems such as missing the branding on edited fields. Steps to reproduce: - Use a single browser instance and do not log any user out. - Start with `website_sale`. - Make "demo" user a restricted editor and a sales administrator. - Connect on 127.0.0.1 as "demo" and go to a product website page. - Go to 127.0.0.2 as a visitor and go to the same product page. => The product name field of the visitor page was branded. If you swap the last two steps, the "demo" user's page lacks the branding. [1]: odoo@7ede9bc task-3482439 X-original-commit: 8218880
|
This PR targets saas-16.1 and is part of the forward-port chain. Further PRs will be created up to master. More info at https://github.com/odoo/odoo/wiki/Mergebot#forward-port |
robodoo
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 1, 2024
When QWeb templates became cached and compiled in [1], the list of default cache key elements did not contain `inherit_branding_auto` (but it included the old `inherit_branding`). Because of this the cache was shared between restricted editors and public users, which could lead to problems such as missing the branding on edited fields. Steps to reproduce: - Use a single browser instance and do not log any user out. - Start with `website_sale`. - Make "demo" user a restricted editor and a sales administrator. - Connect on 127.0.0.1 as "demo" and go to a product website page. - Go to 127.0.0.2 as a visitor and go to the same product page. => The product name field of the visitor page was branded. If you swap the last two steps, the "demo" user's page lacks the branding. [1]: 7ede9bc task-3482439 closes #156081 X-original-commit: 8218880 Signed-off-by: Romain Derie (rde) <rde@odoo.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When QWeb templates became cached and compiled in 1, the list of default cache key elements did not contain
inherit_branding_auto(but it included the oldinherit_branding).Because of this the cache was shared between restricted editors and public users, which could lead to problems such as missing the branding on edited fields.
Steps to reproduce:
website_sale.=> The product name field of the visitor page was branded.
If you swap the last two steps, the "demo" user's page lacks the branding.
task-3482439
Forward-Port-Of: #155264