Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FIX] web: inconsistent daterange validation #162000

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: 17.0
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

sabr-odoo
Copy link
Contributor

Spec:
In the daterange widget, if the second date field is required and left empty, the field should be marked as invalid and be colored red.

Observed behavior:
if the second field is empty so that fields is not highlighted in red.

Expected behavior:
if the second field is empty so that fields should be highlighted in red.

Task-3786540

@robodoo
Copy link
Contributor

robodoo commented Apr 16, 2024

@C3POdoo C3POdoo added the RD research & development, internal work label Apr 16, 2024
SPECIFICATION:
In the daterange widget, if the second date field is required and left empty,
the field should be marked as invalid and be colored red.

Observed behavior:
if the second field is empty so that fields is not highlighted in red.

Expected behavior:
if the second field is empty so that fields should be highlighted in red.

Task-3786540
@sabr-odoo sabr-odoo force-pushed the 17.0-inconsistent-daterange-validation-fix-sabr branch from caae35b to 42f0d94 Compare April 16, 2024 07:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
RD research & development, internal work
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants