-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[FIX] web: tests: fix randomly failing load state tests #162939
Closed
aab-odoo
wants to merge
1
commit into
odoo:17.0
from
odoo-dev:17.0-fix-load-state-undeterministic-tests-aab
Closed
[FIX] web: tests: fix randomly failing load state tests #162939
aab-odoo
wants to merge
1
commit into
odoo:17.0
from
odoo-dev:17.0-fix-load-state-undeterministic-tests-aab
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Before this commit, several qunit load state tests sometimes failed. They all follow the same pattern: - trigger an "hashchange" event to simulate an update of the url - wait twice for nextTick - check the DOM reflects the url change However, waiting for 2 ticks isn't enough. Indeed, when the url hash is set, our mock location object dispatches a "real" hashchange event on window, but it does it after a setTimeout [1]. Then, the webclient is notified (via the router service) of the url change, and reacts by loading the appropriate action. This then requires 2 ticks, because we first clear the DOM with the BlankComponent, and then we mount the requested action/view. This commit makes those tests more robust by waiting for a setTimeout before the 2 nextTicks. [1] https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/1882d8f89f760bd1ff8a2bf0ae798939402647a3/addons/web/static/tests/setup.js#L52 Runbot issue~37030
aab-odoo
force-pushed
the
17.0-fix-load-state-undeterministic-tests-aab
branch
from
April 23, 2024 07:28
a5a1575
to
c38447b
Compare
robodoo r+ |
robodoo
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 23, 2024
Before this commit, several qunit load state tests sometimes failed. They all follow the same pattern: - trigger an "hashchange" event to simulate an update of the url - wait twice for nextTick - check the DOM reflects the url change However, waiting for 2 ticks isn't enough. Indeed, when the url hash is set, our mock location object dispatches a "real" hashchange event on window, but it does it after a setTimeout [1]. Then, the webclient is notified (via the router service) of the url change, and reacts by loading the appropriate action. This then requires 2 ticks, because we first clear the DOM with the BlankComponent, and then we mount the requested action/view. This commit makes those tests more robust by waiting for a setTimeout before the 2 nextTicks. [1] https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/1882d8f89f760bd1ff8a2bf0ae798939402647a3/addons/web/static/tests/setup.js#L52 Runbot issue~37030 closes #162939 Signed-off-by: Lucas Perais (lpe) <lpe@odoo.com>
This was referenced Apr 23, 2024
willylohws
pushed a commit
to willylohws/odoo
that referenced
this pull request
May 1, 2024
Before this commit, several qunit load state tests sometimes failed. They all follow the same pattern: - trigger an "hashchange" event to simulate an update of the url - wait twice for nextTick - check the DOM reflects the url change However, waiting for 2 ticks isn't enough. Indeed, when the url hash is set, our mock location object dispatches a "real" hashchange event on window, but it does it after a setTimeout [1]. Then, the webclient is notified (via the router service) of the url change, and reacts by loading the appropriate action. This then requires 2 ticks, because we first clear the DOM with the BlankComponent, and then we mount the requested action/view. This commit makes those tests more robust by waiting for a setTimeout before the 2 nextTicks. [1] https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/1882d8f89f760bd1ff8a2bf0ae798939402647a3/addons/web/static/tests/setup.js#L52 Runbot issue~37030 closes odoo#162939 Signed-off-by: Lucas Perais (lpe) <lpe@odoo.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Before this commit, several qunit load state tests sometimes failed. They all follow the same pattern:
However, waiting for 2 ticks isn't enough. Indeed, when the url hash is set, our mock location object dispatches a "real" hashchange event on window, but it does it after a setTimeout [1]. Then, the webclient is notified (via the router service) of the url change, and reacts by loading the appropriate action. This then requires 2 ticks, because we first clear the DOM with the BlankComponent, and then we mount the requested action/view.
This commit makes those tests more robust by waiting for a setTimeout before the 2 nextTicks.
[1]
odoo/addons/web/static/tests/setup.js
Line 52 in 1882d8f
Runbot issue~37030
Description of the issue/feature this PR addresses:
Current behavior before PR:
Desired behavior after PR is merged:
I confirm I have signed the CLA and read the PR guidelines at www.odoo.com/submit-pr