Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

change licence into REUSE format #442

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Jan 24, 2018
Merged

change licence into REUSE format #442

merged 4 commits into from Jan 24, 2018

Conversation

uvchik
Copy link
Member

@uvchik uvchik commented Jan 23, 2018

According to #406 I changed the license file with find/replace. This leads to the same copyright in every file but that's all I will do to end this annoying topic.

Feel free to change it for individual files (add your name or remove a name), but remove names with care.

"""
This module is about something....

Copyright (c) 2014-2018 Cord Kaldemeyer, Simon Hilpert, Stefan Günther,
                        Uwe Krien

SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-3.0-or-later
"""

@uvchik uvchik added this to the v0.2.1 milestone Jan 23, 2018
@uvchik uvchik self-assigned this Jan 23, 2018
Copy link

@Ludee Ludee left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For the REUSE style each copyright holder needs one line.
As far as I know the year is not necessary and just creates maintenance costs.
And the "real name" is not obligatory. The handle should be fine.

@uvchik
Copy link
Member Author

uvchik commented Jan 24, 2018

Okay I read the reuse text again and found something that exactly meets our needs. The following paragraph comes from (https://reuse.software/practices/2.0/).

For a project using the version control system to convey information about copyright, you must:

  • make sure the version control system is publicly accessible and take steps1 to ensure it will remain so,
  • provide a link back to the original file in version control from each header,
  • ensure that if someone copies the source repository without version control system metadata (such as if they make a tar-file of it), then the version control system metadata relevant for determining copyright must still be included, for example in the form of a bill of materials (see later), an automatically generated log file or similar,
  • make sure the commit metadata reflect the actual copyright (this is particularly important if a project accepts code contributed through mailing lists, bug trackers, or similar, where the original copyright holder is not the one pushing code to version control, or where the copyright is held by an organisation rather than the author.)

An appropriate header in this case would be:

 /*
  * This file is part of project X. It's copyrighted by the contributors
  * recorded in the version control history of the file, available from
  * its original location http://git.example.com/X/filename.c
  * 
  * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-3.0
  */

In our case e.g. for the graph.py module this would be:

"""
Some module text.....

This file is part of project oemof. It's copyrighted by the contributors
recorded in the version control history of the file, available from
its original location https://github.com/oemof/oemof/graph.py

SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-3.0
""""

@Ludee
Copy link

Ludee commented Jan 24, 2018

That is a perfect solution. I didn't see that part in the documentation yesterday.
So we just need to put the path/url for each file.

License ID would be:
SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-3.0-or-later

@uvchik
Copy link
Member Author

uvchik commented Jan 24, 2018

Some module text..... This file is part of project oemof. It's copyrighted by the contributors recorded in the version control history of the file, available from its original location https://github.com/oemof/oemof/graph.py SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-3.0

I adapted the files to the text above.

I added the main authors as reviewers. If they agree I will merge this branch to avoid more merge conflicts as necessary in the future.

Copy link
Member

@ckaldemeyer ckaldemeyer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@uvchik
Copy link
Member Author

uvchik commented Jan 24, 2018

I did not add the license for the documentation. I think this is something else for somebody else.

@Ludee What you create a PR for the documentation?

Copy link
Member

@simnh simnh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice!

@Ludee
Copy link

Ludee commented Jan 24, 2018

@Ludee What you create a PR for the documentation?

I can change the Wiki template in https://github.com/oemof/oemof/wiki/Header-and-License

Or do you mean an open license on the documentation readthedocs?

@uvchik
Copy link
Member Author

uvchik commented Jan 24, 2018

Okay, I talked to @Ludee. and we decided to change the copyright of the documentation from 2014 oemof-team' to 2014-2018 oemof-developer-group` just to make it right.

Then we will start a new PR to change it to a different license such as creative commons.

I would prefer a simple "by" license but other developer may think different.

@Ludee
Copy link

Ludee commented Jan 24, 2018

The generated url to the files are not working. They need the blob/master/ part as well.
When putting long url names (long filename in folder) PEP8 is complaining.

@uvchik
Copy link
Member Author

uvchik commented Jan 24, 2018

  1. PEP8 allows long URLs.

  2. If we use the blob we have to change it for every branch which is kind of annoying. What we can do is to provide a basic link github.com/oemof/oemof and the relative link oemof/oemof/solph/network.py which is shown on top of the site within github.

This file is part of project oemof (github.com/oemof/oemof). It's copyrighted by the 
contributors recorded in the version control history of the file, available from its
original location oemof/oemof/solph/network.py

SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-3.0-or-later

oeli

This is valid for every branch!

@uvchik uvchik merged commit 0569712 into dev Jan 24, 2018
@uvchik uvchik deleted the revision/licence_reuse branch January 24, 2018 20:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants