You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi and thank you for all the work you put into this library - very much appreciated.
We currently build a UI around the core functionality of TESPy and I thus need to capture some of the logging and printing output - either for rerouting it to the UI or for reporting progress, errors and results.
While working on this, I noticed that TESPy uses the root node logger from the logging framework. Would it be OK if I submitted a PR covering the following two points:
Replace the root logger with a named logger (from the logging framework) that can be accessed and modified using a unique ID like TESPyRoot for example.
Include the option to provide call-back functions to retrieve status messages instead of printing these messages directly to stdout?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi and thank you for all the work you put into this library - very much appreciated.
We currently build a UI around the core functionality of TESPy and I thus need to capture some of the logging and printing output - either for rerouting it to the UI or for reporting progress, errors and results.
While working on this, I noticed that TESPy uses the root node logger from the logging framework. Would it be OK if I submitted a PR covering the following two points:
TESPyRoot
for example.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: