Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New feature: CoolProp backend selection #174

Merged
merged 53 commits into from Apr 13, 2020
Merged

Conversation

fwitte
Copy link
Member

@fwitte fwitte commented Apr 7, 2020

The changes in this PR allow to select from the different backends in CoolProp and resolves #170.

@fwitte
Copy link
Member Author

fwitte commented Apr 7, 2020

Additional tests are needed to check

  • performance differences in the backends and
  • result accuracy.

@fwitte
Copy link
Member Author

fwitte commented Apr 7, 2020

Furthermore a test should be added, that tests if the mixture of a tespy_fluid with another fluid yields the same results as a mixture of the single fluids in regards to the method s_mix_pT.

@pep8speaks
Copy link

pep8speaks commented Apr 8, 2020

Hello @fwitte! Thanks for updating this PR. We checked the lines you've touched for PEP 8 issues, and found:

There are currently no PEP 8 issues detected in this Pull Request. Cheers! 🍻

Comment last updated at 2020-04-13 19:15:45 UTC

@fwitte fwitte merged commit 1012e13 into dev Apr 13, 2020
@fwitte fwitte deleted the feature/CoolProp_backend branch April 13, 2020 19:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

The specification of the CoolProp backend can save calculation time
2 participants