Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow newer versions of ember-concurrency #29

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 2, 2019
Merged

Allow newer versions of ember-concurrency #29

merged 1 commit into from
May 2, 2019

Conversation

jakesjews
Copy link
Contributor

Loosen the ember-concurrency version to allow deduping

@jakesjews jakesjews changed the title allow newer versions of ember-concurrency Allow newer versions of ember-concurrency May 2, 2019
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
},
"dependencies": {
"ember-cli-babel": "^7.1.2",
"ember-concurrency": "^0.8.27",
"ember-concurrency": "^0.8.27 || ^0.9.0 || ^0.10.0",
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would ~0.8.27 be a simpler and longer solution to this?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think that will restrict it further to only versions within 0.8.x instead of allowing it to be a higher version

Copy link
Contributor Author

@jakesjews jakesjews May 2, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

0.x versions are kinda weird in that using ^ will only bump the third number since below version 0 considers the second number to be major versions

Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, you're totally right. I 100% spaced on this. Maybe something like this >=0.8.0 < 1.0.0 ?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i think that could work the only downside might be if theres a version 0.11.0 and it has a breaking change thats incompatible with this library

Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Alright, I'll just merge this and patch release it. I can always come back to it 😄

@offirgolan offirgolan merged commit bfaf67c into offirgolan:master May 2, 2019
@offirgolan
Copy link
Owner

Published with v1.1.1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants