Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Document rationale in README? #403

Closed
ArniDagur opened this issue Jul 4, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

Document rationale in README? #403

ArniDagur opened this issue Jul 4, 2018 · 2 comments
Assignees
@ogham
Labels
community › docs Documentation stuff
Milestone
v0.9.0

Comments

@ArniDagur
Copy link

Here are some example questions that would be cool to see answered in the README file:

  • What were the motivations for a ls replacement?
  • Where does exa shine where ls doesn't?
  • What are exa's goals? (to be the fastest? the easiest to use? etc)
@ArniDagur
Copy link
Author

I just noticed that all of this information is on the website. I guess it would be nice to have it here on Github too.

@ogham ogham added the community › docs Documentation stuff label Sep 24, 2018
@ogham ogham self-assigned this Sep 24, 2018
@ogham
Copy link
Owner

ogham commented Sep 24, 2018

I don’t see why not!

@ogham ogham added this to the v0.9.0 milestone Sep 24, 2018
@pconcepcion pconcepcion mentioned this issue Oct 21, 2018
Merged
@ogham ogham closed this as completed in 904a069 Dec 6, 2018
ogham added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 6, 2018
@ogham
Merge pull request #430 from pconcepcion/master
612580d 
Added Rationale section to README.md (fixes #403)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@ogham ogham

Labels
community › docs Documentation stuff
Projects
None yet
Milestone
v0.9.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@ogham @ArniDagur