bfopen: save individual series' original metadata (rebased onto dev_4_4) #587
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Previously the union of all series' original metadata was stored once for each series. This causes potentially substantially more memory to be used, and makes it more difficult to read original metadata.
|
BIOFORMATS-merge-matlab-stable#53 is green with this PR merged in. 👍 Ready to merge. |
melissalinkert
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 4, 2013
…tadata bfopen: save individual series' original metadata (rebased onto dev_4_4)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is the same as gh-573 but rebased onto dev_4_4.
Previously the union of all series' original metadata was stored once
for each series. This causes potentially substantially more memory to
be used, and makes it more difficult to read original metadata.
See: http://lists.openmicroscopy.org.uk/pipermail/ome-users/2013-June/003816.html
/cc @sbesson