Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Travis (via .travis.yml) to CI pipline #7

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 20, 2020

Conversation

legionth
Copy link
Member

@legionth legionth commented Feb 12, 2020

Introduce Travis CI as our CI service.

This should help us create a CI pipline to ease our release cycles in the future.

This file contain much (yet!), but in one of the upcoming PRs we will intodruce e.g. PHPUnit, which will be part of our CI pipeline.

Relevant Issues: #8

@legionth legionth added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 12, 2020
@legionth
Copy link
Member Author

Hm, seems like travis wants to execute phpunit. I'll check out why. In .travis.yml there is currently no indication for phpunit (yet).

@legionth
Copy link
Member Author

Oh seems the PHP versions from travis come along with XDebug and PHPUnit by default.

https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/languages/php/#choosing-php-versions-to-test-against

Maybe we should intodruce PHPUnit in this PR too or should we accept that travis fails for now?

@legionth
Copy link
Member Author

Just tested it on my fork. Seems like we have to introduce PHPUnit so travis with PHP can run successfully.

legionth#1

@legionth
Copy link
Member Author

Any strong opionons here? @jayay and @dkaisers

@legionth
Copy link
Member Author

It works 🎉 :shipit:

Copy link
Member

@dkaisers dkaisers left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice 👍

@dkaisers dkaisers merged commit ed88f36 into onOfficeGmbH:master Feb 20, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants